Breaking News
0
有香港版
您更倾向于浏览Investing.com的中文版吗?

Global funds cut equity exposure in turbulent February, eye virus risk: Reuters poll

EconomyFeb 27, 2020 08:16PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 

By Rahul Karunakar

BENGALURU (Reuters) - Global funds changed course in February and recommended a cut to equity allocations in their model balanced portfolio after taking them to a two-year high in January, instead suggesting an increase in bond holdings, Reuters polls showed.

The findings come as major indexes on Wall Street look set for their steepest weekly plunge since the global financial crisis more than a decade ago, as rising numbers of new coronavirus infections outside China increase fears of a pandemic.

"At present we feel it is appropriate to err on the side of caution until the scale and impact of the virus, and the longer-term economic implications, are slightly better understood and quantifiable than they are today," said Mark Robinson, chief investment officer at Bordier & Cie UK.

The monthly poll of 38 wealth managers and CIOs in Europe, the United States, Britain and Japan, taken Feb. 11-27, showed equity exposure fell on average to 49.1% in a global balanced portfolio, from 49.7% in January, which was a two-year high.

Bond allocations were increased to 41.4% on average from 40.3%.

"Clearly, any further escalation and a rise in the fatality rates (from the coronavirus) will create further worries for the global authorities and the markets," said Peter Lowman, chief investment officer at Investment Quorum in London.

U.S. Treasury yields fell to record lows this week, with the yield on the benchmark 10-year note reaching an all-time low for the third consecutive day, on bets the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates to help soften the expected blow to the world's largest economy from the virus' disruptions.

"With the likelihood that the Fed will cut interest rates further over the coming months if the coronavirus were to spread further, or worse still, become an epidemic, the security of the U.S. Treasury market remains appealing," added Lowman.

When asked what is the likely change to their portfolio over the next six months, a strong majority of fund managers said at best they would maintain the current risk positioning or they would reduce exposure to riskier assets.

That suggests fund managers are not confident about a significant lift-off in stocks over the coming months despite widespread expectations of monetary policy easing.

The economic hit from the virus is not going to help. A separate Reuters poll of economists showed major economies in Asia would slow down significantly, stall or shrink outright in the current quarter.

"The coronavirus outbreak remains our top near-term concern for global growth and the markets. The immediate impact appears to be concentrated in Asia, but all governments are taking the threats very seriously and are taking steps to contain the spread of the virus," said Alan Gayle, president at Via Nova Investment Management.

"Our most likely scenario is that the virus will continue to weigh on the markets for the next several months, but that it will not induce a global recession."

A separate Reuters poll of analysts, brokers and strategists on Thursday showed that while global stocks have further to run this year, the severity of the economic hit from the coronavirus outbreak was the biggest risk and gains would be much weaker than last year. [EPOLL/WRAP]

(Additional reporting and polling by Sarmista Sen in BENGALURU and Fumika Inoue in TOKYO; Editing by Ross Finley and Dan Grebler)

Global funds cut equity exposure in turbulent February, eye virus risk: Reuters poll
 

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (1)
Chris Sundo
Chris Sundo Feb 27, 2020 10:35PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Could also be related to Fed shrinking the money supply "more aggressively than previously thought" (verbatim quote from Thursday, Feb 13) .. repo loan pay-back .. Wall street firms owe the fed big money and someone else has to make up for the diff of what fell through the cracks and can't be repaid. Also, S.E.C. wants to restrict the trading of 'L&I' ETFs (Leveraged and Inverse) thus investors are dumping Long ETF investment vehicles.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email
We have a special offer for you