[Source] Interface News
[Declaration] This article is limited to the use of learning and communication. In case of infringement, we will promptly delete it.
Liu Zhonglin requested in the “State Compensation Application” that due to the fact that the claimant was restricted to personal liberty for 9218 days, the national compensation shall be paid in accordance with the national The standard 284.74 yuan standard triple payment of compensation. The wrong judgment caused the claimant to bear the name of "murderer" for 28 years, causing great mental and physical trauma to the claimant. He has so far been unable to get along and communicate with others, and even has symptoms of mental depression. Continue treatment.
Mongolia 28 years ago, Jilin Liu Zhonglin The intentional homicide case was made clear. Liu Zhonglin also became the longest-held retrial culprit in the current public media coverage. On May 23, Liu Zhonglin submitted the "State Compensation Application" to the Compensation Committee of the Higher People's Court of Jilin Province.
In the “State Compensation Application”, Liu Zhonglin requested the Liaoyuan Intermediate People’s Court of Jilin Province to pay him 787319.96 yuan for infringement of personal freedom compensation, 8 million yuan for compensation for mental damage, and compensation for the costs of compensation. Expenditure of 500,000 yuan, compensation for late treatment costs 300,000 yuan, the amount of compensation for a total of 16674199.96 yuan.
Liu Zhonglin also requested that Liaoyuan City Intermediate People’s Court be in countries and provinces such as CCTV, People’s Daily, China Youth Daily, Sina.com and Xinhua.net, Jilin Daily, and Liaoyuan Daily. The media made a public apology and restored their reputation in order to eliminate the negative impact of the wrong judgment.
Qu Zhenhong, a lawyer of Beijing Huayi Law Firm, who is responsible for applying for state compensation in the case, introduced the interface news. Today, the court accepted the compensation application and the claimant’s contact information and asked them to go back and wait for the news. .
(Liu Zhonglin submits the "State Compensation Application") Image Source : The case was provided by a lawyer.
The Liu Zhonglin murder case was a cohabitation that occurred 28 years ago.case. On October 28, 1990, at 9:00 a.m. that day, villagers in Huimin Village, Lingyun Township, Dongliao County, Jilin Province dug out a woman's body in a cabbage field on the edge of the river. Subsequently, the villager, 22-year-old Liu Zhonglin, was locked in as a major suspect by the police and was taken away on the evening of the discovery of the body. On July 11, 1994, the Liaoyuan Intermediate People's Court of Jilin Province made a first-instance judgment that Liu Zhonglin was found guilty of intentional homicide and sentenced to death, suspended for two years, and deprived of political rights for life. On August 8, 1995, the Higher People's Court of Jilin Province approved the death sentence.
After he was imprisoned, Liu Zhonglin kept shouting and insisted on appealing. On March 28, 2012, the High Court of Jilin Province issued a retrial decision and decided to re-trial the Liu Zhonglin intentional homicide case. In January 2016, Liu Zhonglin was released from prison after serving nearly 25 years of actual punishment. On April 25 of the same year, the case was retried for the first time.
Liu Zhonglin’s rehearing defense lawyer Zhang Yupeng defended him as not guilty. Zhang Yupeng believes that Liu Zhonglin’s limb was seriously damaged and repeatedly stated that he was tortured by the investigating agency. His guilty confession was illegal evidence caused by extorting a confession by torture and should be excluded; his confession contained a large number of self-contradictory guilty confessions and was inconsistent with the testimony of witnesses. The confession and confession that caters to the investigation agency's intentions. According to the existing evidence, there are still many doubts in the case that have not been ascertained and cannot meet the criteria for excluding reasonable doubts. On April 20, 2018, the Higher People's Court of Jilin Province sent a verdict on Liu Zhonglin's intentional homicide case. The retrial judgement shows that the original trial found that Liu Zhonglin’s facts of killing the victim Zheng Moumuli were unclear, and the evidence was insufficient. The original crimes against the public prosecution authorities could not be established, and the revocation of the Jilin Provincial Higher People's Court (1995) Criminal Verdict No. 52 Criminal Verdict and Liaoyuan was announced. The Intermediate People's Court of the City (1994) Criminal Penalty of Liao Penzheng No. 18 declared Liu Zhonglin not guilty.
Before April 20, although Liu Zhonglin had been released from prison for two years, he had been burdened with the murder of the murderer. He removed jobs in Changchun, Dalian and Shenzhen, the longest A job only took 4 months, the shortest only 3 days. "After checking out my identity information, I won't need me when I get past prison." He told the news on the interface.
Liu Zhonglin stated in the “State Compensation Application” that during his detention in the detention center, because he did not kill anyone, he could not describe the so-called “killing” process as required, and investigators tortured the investigators.To the illegal use of the device, "砸" weighed 30 pounds, but also three shifts of the "wheel fight" day and night interrogation, and sometimes even with the triangle belt to smash the claimant, hit a bloody.
Because the circumstances of the 'confession' and the clues held by the police do not match, the investigators brutally inserted bamboo sticks into the nails of the ten fingers of the claimant. The same police officer used one. Mido's long, two-and-three centimeter-thick steel bars wounded the right-hand thumb of the claimant, eventually causing him to amputate his limbs and bring him permanent disability, said Liu Zhonglin.
At the same time, Liu Zhonglin also suffered from depression. He also thought of returning to the life of the village in which he had raised him, but "he felt that he could not lift his head." The former dirt road in the village had already turned into a concrete road. The adobe houses of the villagers had disappeared. It was replaced by a red-brick bungalow. Only his original adobe house was abandoned on the roadside and it was already ruined.
Liu Zhonglin requested in the "State Compensation Application" that, given that the claimant was limited to personal liberty for 9,218 days, he should pay 3 times the standard of the state's announced daily compensation rate of 284.74 yuan to cover personal freedom National compensation. The wrong judgment caused the claimant to bear the name of "murderer" for 28 years, causing great mental and physical trauma to the claimant. He has so far been unable to get along and communicate with others, and even has symptoms of mental depression. Continue treatment.
On May 23rd, Qu Zhenhong told the news on the interface that the spiritual soothing payment in the Liu Zhonglin case was filed in accordance with the 100% violation of personal freedom compensation because the Liu Zhonglin case was even worse than other slanders. More damage.
Qu Zhenhong analysis, first, Liu Zhonglin was the longest time, more than anyone else; Second, Liu Zhonglin, the longest time, the longest time, people have been hanging out The reputation of “killer” decided to take another six years to retry until the final result.
“Now Liu Zhonglin has nothing, alone. If there is no such case, the 50-year-old is enjoying his grandchildren in the northeast. His current state is caused by this embarrassing case.” Qu Zhenhong said that Liu Zhonglin’s mental condition is very poor, depressed, unwilling to meet with other people, and requires post-treatment, so he proposed compensation for late-stage treatment in the “State Compensation Application”.
Follow"PKU University Legal Information Network", Reply Keyword "Mortgage Rights" Download "Analysis of the rules and practices of mortgage adjudication"
Following “Beijing University Legal Information Network”, Reply keyword “Precedent” to download “65,000 words of practical dry goods: 77 cases of detailed contract Validation Review Rules (2016)"
Follow "PKU Legal Information Network", Reply Keywords "< Strong>The Supreme Court"Download the Supreme Court Guiding Case Judgment Collection"
Concern"PKU University Legal Information Network", < Strong>Reply Keyword "Commercial Housing"Download "Dry Goods: Analysis of Practice Issues for Commodity Housing Sale Contracts"