School: Zhejiang Communication Institute
Students are required to fill in the leave slip during the class, but also to find two teachers to sign, and a limited number of 100 a day? Recently, a class of special leave request in Linyi City, Yunnan Province triggered a heated discussion among netizens. In response, the relevant teachers of the school responded that this leave is mainly aimed at students with poor self-control ability, preventing them from going out of the toilet during class to smoke or performing some disciplinary activities that are unrelated to learning. However, some experts believe that such a practice will make students unhappy psychologically. “Physiology is restrained, and mentality will not be sunny”.
The school says that students are required to write fake articles when they go to class to go to the toilet. They are aimed at students with poor self-control. But the provision itself is "one size fits all". The incommensurability between the group and the actually involved groups also means that the regulations will affect the innocent groups, and the harmlessness is also proof of the “blindness” of the design itself. With this provision, the self-control can be really curbed. Poor students go to the toilet during school hours to smoke, or make other disciplinary actions? Fear of not, leave notes and all kinds of auditing signatures, in the final analysis or form of things, there is no real constraint, and it does not have toilets for students The real function of what exactly to do to make accurate judgments, to a certain extent, also exposes the "invalidity" of the rule itself.
"Blindness" combined with "invalidity" can give this clause a hat of "Exotic". What do you mean by the word "lazy"? Schools are too lazy to tailor them to specific groups. The law only chooses to apply a simple and crude one-size-fits-all model; schools are too lazy to explore effective ways and methods, but only by throwing out the mandatory rules to be convinced, but they do not know that this provision has been unknowingly brought into the form. Behind the appearance of "lazy" is actually a kind of lazy educational thinking. In the process of educating students, schools are imprisoned by various routines, subjective dependence is serious, and the lack of a combination of education And reasonable thinking, there is no way to talk about true proactiveness.
The special education and management model behind this inert educational mindset can be regarded as the environment that nurtured this kind of thinking. We know that many middle schools still advocate strict education and militarization management. It is true that this model carries and even unleashes the dream of no mathematics and allows them to successfully fly to a higher stage.The writer is also a student of this model. Although he never stopped screaming at it, but now he thinks of it more. Is a thankful one Su because itNot only did I get out of my hometown, I had the opportunity to find an ocean of interest, and I wanted to surf in it. I also allowed self-discipline, perseverance, hard work, and other qualities and habits to still accompany me and help me to continue.
But things are two-sided In particular, strict education and militarized management are themselves easily controversial models, and their two-faced nature will only become more apparent. To put it directly, this type of apparently rigid machinery is actually more restrictive, and it can easily give students a sense of closure and behavioral thinking. It can also stifle personality and even bring about psychological distortion. Thus, It is possible that students will fall in one after another "bad routine" pit, and it is difficult to climb up.
So, It cannot be simply because this model can bring about a glorious rate of further studies, but also brings some practical benefits to students. It does not try to rationalize and scientifically combine social common sense and social moral principles. In other words, affirming some of the advantages of this model is correct, but in time to reflect on this model and its specific expressions are true to the touch of human nature and the disregard for the students' emotions and character, I hope more users can Recognizing this point, the practical significance of this discussion has been raised to the extent that it can address problems and resolve problems.
Of course, reflection and discussion, Nor is it a complete negation of the purely mandatory and standardized path. This path has its own unique value and cannot be replaced. But in the realistic vision of making students better and making education better, link this path with humanistic considerations and integrate it with more proactive and perfect paths. More realistic Respect, more pure education, giving a sensible wing to the means of coercion, pouring the initial heart of education for normative purposes.
Strict education and militarization management are not possible to reverse this mode at one time and another, and there is no need to completely reverse it, but you can do whatever you can and seek normative exploration. Take the balance into consideration. Therefore, we may start from correcting the inertial educational thinking, actively transform inertia into flexibility, and awaken the realistic vitality of relieving the path, and use truth education to set aside the quality education.
Zhejiang Daily Full Media Commentary Theory Department
Edit | Riboud
Layouts | Anin