On May 15, Yunnan Net News, netizens broke the news that students in Linyi No. 1 had to go to the toilet to write fake notes, and they needed to be audited by the class teacher and guard on duty, and each day. Only 100. In response, the school responded that the leave requirement was mainly aimed at students with poor self-control, preventing them from going out to the toilet or performing some disciplinary activities during class hours. A limit of 100 a day is a misrepresentation.
Some experts believe that such a practice by the school will make the students unhappy, the teachers and students must trust each other, trust is the most basic, trust is lost, and mutual trust between school management and classmates and teachers will create loopholes. Class teachers should be more compatible and inclusive to see the students' physiological needs. "Physiology is constrained and the mind will not be sunny."
There are media commentaries saying that this is a typical case of formalism. For a long time, many middle schools and even individual universities have popularized the so-called “military management”. They regard students as disciplined workers and are all large and small formalism. Behind formalism, there is also neglect and infringement of student dignity. Treating every student as a thief will only arouse conflict and confrontational emotions, and it will not benefit education.
Education is not a panacea.
I It is believed that the school did not make mistakes in this matter, but was over-interpreted by the media and experts. To say it lightly is to use abstract, seemingly tall, metaphysical theory to comment on the school's specific behavior. At first glance it makes sense that it does not actually solve any real problems. When it comes to reiterating the importance of experts and the media, the education and the management of the school are gesticulating.
First of all, it's not normal for students to go to the toilet during classes, and the exception of toilets in class is an exception. There are certain procedures and systems in school teaching, and students and teachers must abide by it. Just to mention the problem of class, we know that there are eight or nine lessons a day in the school, and one class, from 40 minutes to 50 minutes. There are breaks between classes, teachers and students can use the time between classes. Go to the toilet and get out of the classroom. In the class, the teacher lectured on it. The students really had a hurry. For example, diarrhea and toilets were understandable. However, some classmates excuse themselves from using the toilet in class., what kind of lesson is there?
Second, normal school management is not formalism, nor does it constitute a neglect or infringement of student personal dignity. We believe that schools, teachers and students are the relationship between educators and educated people. The school formulates management methods and all management methods are for the healthy development of students and the normal operation of teaching order. On the one hand, there is no school to take students as thief to prevent, can we say that any school management is to prevent students. The school's leave system, examination system, and attendance system all restrict and restrict students. Is this also the same as preventing students? On the other hand, asking the students to go to the toilet during classes is an abnormal management method. It does not mean that they are not allowed to go to the toilet. They are all ignoring the students’ right to study.
Third, trust between teachers and students is not an unprincipled resignation. Mutual trust is a kind of psychological recognition. Students must recognize the teacher and accredit the school so that the teacher can fully recognize the teacher. Experts say that such a provision has the idea of degrading the school's humanistic education and will make students unhappy. Seeing this, the author can only hehe. The students are divided into threes and sixs. Good students do not need to manage, they will also strictly abide by the discipline of the school. However, some students will find ways to escape the management of the school and the teacher and require that the teacher’s comprehensive and conscientious education is feasible. However, Strict management is necessary. The student is not a glass heart and cannot touch it.
A reader said: Why can't we do this? It is difficult to teach students without being a teacher. There are many students, especially in private or poorly-run public schools, who have nothing to say in class to go to the toilet. They just don't mind reading. If you have to hold back, you will go to class and throw it away. He doesn’t want to go to class. Your teacher doesn’t want to go to school. He clamored with you, affecting class, if you use the leave strip to prevent the effectiveness, why not try?
The writer thought of the Internet. A paragraph of the article: "The teacher is trapped in the toilet"
One day, in class, a student asked to go to the toilet, the teacher felt that the order of the classroom was inaccurate. resultThe child urinates in his pants.
Parents sued the Education Bureau: The teacher violated human nature and denied students the right to go to the toilet. They should be severely punished.
On another day, in class, another student asked to go to the toilet and the teacher approved it. Who knows that the student was injured in slipping in the toilet.
Parents sued the Education Bureau: During the class, the teacher let the students leave the classroom without permission, causing the students to be harmed. The teacher did not fulfill his duty of guardianship and should be severely punished.
On another day, in class, another student requested to go to the toilet. The teacher was afraid that he would slip in the toilet and go to the nursing school. When the teacher left the classroom, a large number of students clashed in the classroom and many were injured.
Parents jointly sued the Education Bureau: The teacher deserted during class Jobs, resulting in more than one student playing riots and injuries, should be severely punished.
On another day, in class, another student requested to go to the toilet. The teacher led the entire class to go to the toilet.
Parents sued the education department: The teacher did not impart his studies during the class. He has serious work attitudes, dereliction of duties, and is not a good job. He should be severely punished.
Experts do not teach on the first line. The media do not necessarily understand education. They are all right.