The restaurant owner took the staff to rescue the old man. After three years, the restaurant became the defendant who was the winner?

articleweek

The restaurant owner took the staff to rescue the old man. After three years, the restaurant became the defendant who was the winner?

A recent online heat transfer took place in Jinxianqiao, Chengdu, where a restaurant owner organized a staff member to save the old man who had died and was reported to court by his family after three years!

The restaurant owner took the staff to rescue the old man. After three years, the restaurant became the defendant who was the winner?

The passage of events is like this, April 13 Li Chengwei, the rescuer, received a “response notice” from the People’s Court of Jinniu District. The contents of the indictment show that the river management party is the first plaintiff and believes that the elderly person is falling because of the negligence of the river administrator. The reason why the restaurant was listed as a defendant was because the old man fell to a place where food and sewerage were frequently dumped. The road fell due to slippery slippage. He fell to the embankment because there was no guardrail at the slippery shore and he died.

The restaurant owner took the staff to rescue the old man. After three years, the restaurant became the defendant who was the winner?

Saving people on the same night.

Only this The incident triggered a heated discussion among netizens. Is it the responsibility of the river managers and restaurants to fall for the elderly? Why did you think of prosecution after three years? Should the elderly fall? Should they be saved? This caused social morality discussions. Many netizens condemned the family of the deceased. They said that the restaurant owner should not be brought to court. Afterwards, will someone dare to do a good job? There are others who condemn the lawyer and believe that the restaurant owner, Li Chengwei, has been added as The plaintiff is a lawyer's trick because most people don't even think of going to the restaurant!

The restaurant owner took the staff to rescue the old man. After three years, the restaurant became the defendant who was the winner?

Do you think restaurants should be responsible for this matter?